State v. Nathaniel Witherspoon, App. Case No. 2016-306, filed November 2, 2016), REVERSAL based on Improper Victim No-Corroboration Rule

November 18th, 2016
Elizabeth Franklin-Best

This case serves to remind the bench and bar that S.C. Code 16-3-657, which provides that in a sexual assault case the victim’s testimony need not be corroborated is confusing and an unconstitutional comment on the facts by the presiding judge. In State v. Stukes, 416 S.C. 493, 787 S.E.2d 480 (2016), the South Carolina Supreme Court expressly overruled precedent condoning the use of section 16-3-657 as a jury charge and provided that the rule would be effective for all cases pending on direct appeal.

So, there. Stop giving the instruction. Or kitty will bite your desk.

kitten

CONSULTATION FORM





PAY YOUR INVOICE

RECENT POSTS

State v. Kareem Harry, S. C. S...
July 26th, 2017

United States v. All Funds…E...
July 25th, 2017

US v. Arthur Lange, 11th Cir, ...
July 24th, 2017

US v. Seventeen thousand-nine ...
July 18th, 2017